About This Blog

Xenophon's Ghost covers military history and wargaming from the ancient period to modern times.

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

1/72 Ruled Out

I had the chance to see several 1/72 figure sets and vehicles today, ruling the scale out for Bolt Action. Although I suspect Plastic Soldier Co figures are better quality than the brands seen, the size and details of 28mm figures are a more appealing contrast to 15mm figures that I model in other eras.  Plus, 28mm figures will increase the chances of gaming with others in these rules. Those factors are more important than cost in the case of this platoon-scale game.

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Drop Zone Games

I am in Maryland for work, so I had the chance to visit Drop Zone Games in Glen Burnie today. The store carries Warlord Games Bolt Action figures, so I had a chance to see the figs in person. The sculpts are very nice, and seeing the figures increases my interest in 28mm over 20mm, despite the cost difference.

I believe Laurel, MD has a model store that carries 20mm figures. I will check it out later this week.

Sunday, May 5, 2013

1/72 Bolt Action?

I'm toying with the idea of playing Bolt Action in 1/72 scale, instead of the recommended 28mm scale.  I may end up buying test figures in both scales as a comparison.

28mm Pros

  • If I ever play at conventions or tournaments, this will be the standard size.
  • Larger figures will be a nice change from 15mm.
  • Larger scale is visually appealing.
1/72 (20mm) Pros
  • Significantly less expensive than 28mm.
  • Figures have less of a heroic figure.
  • Will look better, visually, on my smaller table here in Korea.
  • May be able to use for Blitzkrieg Commander or other WW II rulesets, too.
In an earlier post, I laid out the cost differences for various 28mm armies.  A 1000 point German Wehrmacht veteran force consisting of three squads, two support units, a Hanomag halftrack, and a Panzer IV would run $82.  Downgrading the infantry to regular training would allow be to throw in a second Hanomag, costing $104, and keeping the force around 1000 points.

Going with the Plastic Soldier Company's 1/72 figures, I could purchase one infantry box, one heavy weapons box, three Hanomags, and three Panzer IVs for $70.  This set would allow me to easily field the same 1000 point force.  In fact, I could field two full platoons with three halftracks and two tanks, as listed below, with figures remaining.


Wehrmacht German Force (Regular Rating)
1st Platoon (Motorized)

2nd Platoon

1st Lt


1st Lt

Medic


Medic

Forward Observer


Forward Observer
Three Infantry Squads

Three Infantry Squads
each with
NCO w/SMG

each with
NCO w/SMG

Soldier with SMG


4 Riflemen

3 Riflemen


LMG Team

2 Panzer Faust




LMG Team



Weapons Squad

Weapons Squad

MMG Team


MMG Team

120mm Mortar


80mm Mortar

Panzerschreck


Panzerschreck
Transport


Transport


3 Hanomag


None
Armor


Armor


Panzer IV


Panzer IV
Total Points Value
1964

Armor Platoon Comparisons

Warlord Games recently provided a new rule for Bolt Action on their website, allowing you to fight with Armoured Platoons.  The basic platoon is three tanks.  For any infantry or weapons support, you must provide transports for all elements.  The rule supplement can be found at the following link:

http://www.warlordgames.com/32598/bolt-action-armoured-platoon-selectors/

Let's compare a 28mm and 1/72 platoon, assuming I purchased the basic infantry platoon in 28mm (described in earlier post) and added more vehicles and elements.

Panzer Platoon
Points
Armoured Platoon

Command Tank
Panzer IV
260

Panzer IV
235

Panzer IV
235
One Infantry Squad
106

NCO w/SMG


Soldier with SMG


3 Riflemen


2 Panzer Faust


LMG Team

Weapons Squad
195

MMG Team


120mm Mortar


Panzerschreck

Transport



2 Hanomag
168
Total Points Value
1199
1/72 Total Cost
$70
28mm Total Cost
$212

I have some more thinking to do.  I'm almost finished with my DBA Later Persian army basing, and I am tackling a terrain project afterward.  I'll probably purchase my first batch of WW II figures in the summer, starting with samples in both scales.




Saturday, May 4, 2013

DBA Game Day

Our DBA group played a few games last weekend.  The following armies battled:

  • Seleucid (Jeff)
  • New Kingdom Egyptians (Rob)
  • Ptolemaic (II/20d) (me)
  • Kappadokian and Arab Conquest (Ryan)
Ryan and I played first. He used the Kappadokians for his first two matches, playing Arab Conquest once against Jeff's newly painted Seleucids.  Ryan had a pretty good winning streak, but he lost all his games today.  He ended up playing the attacker all three times when defense would have suited his force more.  
Ptolemaic vs. Kappadokian
I didn't take too many photos this time, but I did manage a shot of the final fight of our first match.  The Kappadokians had no rough to use to their advantage, and the battle turned into a slugging match.

Elephants force Kappadokian General to Recoil with no room

 My Ptolemaic force is littoral, but I ended up with the water to my back on two occasions.  My bout with the New Kingdom Egyptians featured two amphibious landings, with two Egyptian elements going after my camp.  I finally killed them both, beating the Egyptians 5 to 1.

The fight against Seleucids was very intense, with fights on both flanks and a Scythed Chariot that refused to die for many turns.  Jeff showed his tactical skill again, winning 5 to 1. You can see more photos of the army on his blog: http://littlehordes.blogspot.kr

Final Fight - Seleucids vs Ptolemaic
Of the numerous Successor states, I must say that I like the way the Ptolemaic list plays.  The combination of four Pikes and two Blades, plus an Elephant and some mounted, works pretty well.

Final Tally:


Army
Wins
Losses
New Kingdom Egyptians
1
2
Ptolemaic
2
1
Kappadokian
0
2
Seleucids
3
0
Arab Conquest
0
1